When you want to buy a domain name you get sometimes hundred of possible candidates, here you can check hundred in one go, use with and without the www. :
|
|||||||||||||||
Aug 272009
I was looking at my web stats and logs and saw that www.webvaluer.org though my blog is worth at least 6,000 $. Wow that is not bad ! But who will handle me the money ?? This blog was made with wordpress, so it is easily transferable.
Rank 1,072,439
Domains Linking (est) 2,890 . Didn’t even know so many people found my writings enough interesting to link back to me.
Net Worth $6,270.60
Daily Pageviews 600
Daily Visitors 373
Daily Ad Revenue $2.21 – 5.52
They even valued one of my other domains filmclips.be more than 20,000$ http://www.webvaluer.org/be/www.filmclips.be
Also Diamondsnews.com Estimated Worth $11,936.20 USD
Net Worth $11,936.20
Daily Pageviews 900
Daily Visitors 729
Daily Ad Revenue $4.32 – 10.80
Interesting stuff! Let’s hope now someone want to take some work out of my hands, and handle me a check. You can value your sites at http://www.webvaluer.org
David Norden
Sep 232008
See the Brute Force SEO Promo Video To see the quality of this amazing website. Hey Guys,
Its been a while huh?
Sorry about that, We’ve been so busy with our preparation and beta testing of http://www.BruteForceSEO.com
Ok, So I’m back and I thought, no need to over deliver when I release Brute Force SEO, why not do it now?
Why? To say thanks to all the people who have supported me along the way. And also.. to get the buzz started about BF of course!
You will see how simple it is to Dominate the top 30 of 50 listings in Google using our Big SEO Software. We are ass down heads up in this office getting our Big Software ready for release
So what Am I over delivering on Right now?
New RSS Aggregator with a Twist As well as displaying the contents of the feeds you add providing you nice backlinks
There is a Merge Feature!
Where you can for example list all the RSS Feeds of Your Article Account Feeds Video Directory Feeds
Social Bookmarking Feeds.
Social Site Feeds
Niche Blog Feeds.
and
e.g. you create just one merge feed, containing all the RSS feeds of your Article Accounts.
Then distribute this ONE Feed Via all the other RSS Aggregators
So, see what’s happening here?
When you add an article to any or all of your Article Accounts guess what happens?
This new feed is updated Instantly PLUS, every other RSS Aggregator you listed this feed, will
ALSO Update with this new Content, including your LINKS!
PLUS. I’m rotating YOUR Adsense code on this site 50% of the time!
Yeah Yeah, this is going to C0st Me a L0t.
Nope! Its on the House!
2.
Imagine a Site, Where you can add up to 50 of your great Long Tailed Keyword Phrases,
These were turned into one account and each of these Long Tailed Keyword Terms created
One Page of Related ClickBank Products with YOUR Clickbank ID in it.
Now we are getting somewhere!
Now Imagine, each of these Pages has its OWN RSS FEED.!!!
Now Imagine you post these RSS feeds to a whole bunch of RSS Aggregators who then display the contents
Of these Feeds including your hoplinks.
And because these RSS Aggregators are Authority Sites.
They Rank Well for YOUR Long Tails!
but with your content and CB links!
Yeah Yeah, this is going to C0st Me a L0t.
Nope! Its on the House As Well!
To see all the info related to this Over Delivering and the Video Tutorials on all the Above
Please visit Brute Force SEO You will see how simple it is to Dominate the top 30 of 50 listings in Google using our Big SEO Software. We are ass down heads up in this office getting our Big Software ready for release.
About the Big Software.
Start the software
add your money site url
add your rss feed.
add your your related articles.
add your tags
add your related long tailed keyword phrases.
It Creates a new Unique Gmail email address for you in 15 seconds.
Brute Force SEO Software then goes out and creates a site based on the article content on These Authority Websites
Geocites
Tripod
Googlpages
Blogger blogs
Msn live blogs
Yahoo 360 blogs
WordPress blogs
Knol.Google.com
(All user account information sent to your new Gmail email address)
The software strategically links these sites together so they in and of themselves will Rank Very Well.
Plus providing your site with 2 and 3 way backlinks.
Noting: These are all authority sites that rank very well in and of themselves.
It then goes and submits your rss feed, plus the New RSS Feeds just created to the top 20 Rss aggregators, then submits your articles to the top 20 Article Directories..posts your video url
to the top 20 video directories and (In near future)submit to top 20 social bookmarking sites enabling you to target and dominate very powerful niches in Google, in addition capturing generally 30 of the top 50 listings in Google.
All you do is enter a couple of captchas my software does the rest plus you can do projects concurrently.
(meaning, you can run multiple promotions at once)
Time Taken? about 30 mins.
So while your first project is working away, you can setup your next one at the same time!
This is SEO Automation at its finest! Supplying us Awesome Power in Google, Resulting in top 30 of the Top 50 per run, if used with good niches!!
My members of this product get all my past and future products/reports for free!
This product comes with a members only forum, which is were the magic happens, 100’s of people sharing their tips and tricks and new strategies.
Plus a fortnightly Phone In where everyone can phone in to a teleconference to ask as many questions as you like.
Then as a group we can Power on!!
Jun 182008
For Internet marketing, it’s all about linking up with others
By Dana VanDen Heuvel found June 18, 2008 at greenbaypressgazette.com
Links are the currency of the Internet. The more you have, the better off you are and the more traffic your Web site is likely to receive. The practice of acquiring more links to your Web site is called “link building.”
In short, link building is nothing more than securing links to your Web site from other reputable sites, such as referring partners, local businesses, the chamber of commerce, local directory sites and the like.
For local businesses, here are some link-building tactics that you can start tomorrow:
Link building is significant part of Internet marketing and this is just an introductory class. If you’re looking for master class content, I suggest reading this article, “101 Link Building Tips to Market Your Web site” (www.seobook.com/archives/001792.shtml ).
Happy linking!
Mar 032008
Wow! Your video tutorials were awesome.
I’ve always wonderdered how software developers were able to get so many of their links on so many websites. Thanks to you, now I know! Aaron Brandon
Software is not so much crowded as websites
By Michelle McPhearson
More links = higher rank = more traffic.
“30 Minute Backlinks” is a set of video tutorials thoroughly explaining a previously unpublished method of getting hundreds of one way links to your site.
It shows, in step-by-step follow along detail, the 30 minute process of creating software and adding that software to online software directories (some as high as 5, 6 and 7 PR). Those software directories will link back to your site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There isn’t reciprocal linking, so the search engines won’t discount the links.Read more about this unique way to get your sites ranking high and see your first video at
Best,
Dec 202007
GET Jonathan Leger Search Engine Myths exposed pdf is not available aymore
Google is like the Holy Grail of marketing on the web. Rank well in Google and your profits are pretty much set.
But there is SO MUCH bogus information out there, often coming from the “gurus” themselves.
On January 9th, 2008, Jonathan Leger is releasing a new free report that completely obliterates the following myths about Google (and then goes on to show you what DOES work):
Myth #1: Google Knows All and Sees All
Myth #2: Google Will Not Rank Duplicate Content
Myth #3: You Must Get Links From Related Subject Sites to Rank
Myth #4: Your Site Must Focus On One Subject To Rank
Myth #5: High PageRank Means Good Rankings
Myth #6: To Maintain Good Rankings, You Must Add New Content
..and..
MYTH #7: THE BIGGEST MYTH: Ranking In Google Is Hard!
The site is in pre-launch now, but if you sign up early you will get a sample chapter full of proof and details.
And did I mention he’ll pay you for referring other people to this powerful free report? And that he’ll pay you for anyone THEY refer as well (even while it’s in pre-launch)? Find out more about that when you download your sample chapter from:
Nov 062007
Search Engines Rankings Ups and Downs. How to connect semantically different sites together
November 6, 2007 . By David Norden.
I am personnaly very happy with the new Google Dance. I have kept most of my PR’s and many of my sites are now indexed in Google, like many of the new sites I created only a few months ago (like this site and freshlet.com ) . I have seen my general fresh traffic for all my sites getting up with +/- 30 %. I did this by linking the elements that are semantically related to each other, and by adding new pages to existing sites that have a relevance to other sites, and by including in these pages links to the new (or old) sites.
To improve the ranking of my “news weather” site, I added a page to my diamond site and called it Diamonds weather, the subject is related to Diamonds, Africa And weather on that page is a link to another of my sites related to African News, that when followed by the Google bots will be indexed, making all three sites relevant to each other.
This is how it looked on the Diamond website :
De Beers uses Zeppelin and discovers diamond weather
De Beers pulls back on criticism of SAfrica mine law
This Zeppelin NT airship can provide geophysical survey data to help diamond prospecting companies. Stefan Kuna captured this spectacular Zeppelin lightning diamond weather strike near Jwaneng, Botswana
———————————————-
Find also below an interesting article provided by Alexa to improve your ranks, and subscribe to the newsletter that contains a wealth of informations like what you read below.
Hope you enjoyed my thoughts,
David Norden
| 1. Top 6 reasons why your search engine rankings have dropped |
Have your rankings dropped recently? Before you do anything, you should try to find out what has caused your ranking drop.
1. Your website changes
2. The links to your website change
3. The websites of your competitors change
4. Spam elements on your web pages
5. Search engine algorithm changes
6. Technical problems
Almost any website owner will see a significant ranking drop sooner or later. Don’t panic if this happens to you. Try to find the reason for the ranking drop and then act accordingly. |
=============================================================
How to get HIGH rankings in Google and Yahoo!
Get top 10 rankings in Google and Yahoo with IBP 9.0, the new
version of the popular web marketing tool that brings more
visitors and sales.
Internet marketing experts and magazines recommend IBP. Why?
Because it just works! Find out why a reviewer said that
“IBP turns every novice into an SEO expert overnight” and
get more visitors and more sales through top 10 rankings for
your own site.
Click here to get high rankings in Google and Yahoo =============================================================
Nov 012007
GG Score, not a natural quality. Happy Scarry Halloween …
by David Norden, November 1, 2007
An insider at Google showed a screen capture used by the commercials working on Google Words. The numbers have been changed. Would be interesting to know how much your site is worth ! When will it be in Google Labs ???
Source Zoorgloob
I guess the GG is the virtual value Google puts on the sites but it is not sure, ADV yes/no is probably just telling if the site seems suited for ads, Vertical the possible Ad categories (a bit like in DMOZ ) and PVs some traffic indication.
According to Matt Cutts it is just a tool to find new prospective clients and give them a priority rank. Let’s hope so, …. Big brother is watching your wallet …
The fact is Google is the biggest advertising business on earth at this moment and they feed information to potential clients that’s deliberately misleading to stop people from gaining an unfair advantage with their search rankings, so that the commercials at Google can give “better advice”.
It now appears that, in fact, Google assigns an estimated worth to each ranking on their pages (much better than to know your PR 0 to 10) - visible to members of their AdWords sales team they use the information from your PPC campaigns and analytics package in order to figure out whether you’re worth it, for every page in your site.
We should better try to gain advantage by understanding how search engines are working.
Leave your comments below…
Oct 302007
 |
| Yes, Google Admits Torching Your PageRank |
What is wrong with paid linking and selling links on your site ?
By David Norden, october 30, 2007
For sure Google financial interests are getting more and more in the way of a logical good search result with “algorithms”.
Where I can understand that they don’t enjoy that directories with high PR are selling links on there sites (but who is reading these directories if it isn’t the search engines ??)
I wouldn’t see wrong doing if I was selling a link on a page going to a site with related content.
After all this is why we are doing business, no ? Of course Google can see this as something that will keep adsense clients away … since websites with a good ranking don’t need to pay with adword to get a visitor.
If the content of the page is not relevant to the link I usually put the tag rel=”nofollow” like in this code example:
<a target=”_blank” href=”http://www.webpronews.com:80/insiderreports/2007/10/29/yes-google-admits-torching-your-pagerank” title=”webpronews” rel=”nofollow”>
So if you want to increase your PageRank and don’t want to be penalysed for getting some paid link, use from time to time the rel=”nofollow” tag when the content is not relevant to your page, and don’t put paid links on a page with a high PR if the site you are promoting is not relevant to the page content. Better to sell link, sell a complete page with interesting reading content about the product your client is selling, it won’t look as if the client paid, and everybody will be even more happy.
David Norden
—————————————–
Yes, Google Admits Torching Your PageRank
Submitted by David A. Utter on Mon, 10/29/2007 – found at webpronews
Paid links proved the PageRank undoing for search professionals as well as for prominent sites like The Washington Post, but only recently did Google confess to doing this.
The flaming wreckage of Google’s update took down several sites a couple of PageRank notches. Though it looked like an intentional change, that hadn’t been confirmed.
Until now, that is. Search Engine Journal heard from Matt Cutts about the update, which has had numerous online industry pros in a tizzy. Said Matt:
The partial update to visible PageRank that went out a few days ago was primarily regarding PageRank selling and the forward links of sites. So paid links that pass PageRank would affect our opinion of a site. Going forward, I expect that Google will be looking at additional sites that appear to be buying or selling PageRank.
The PageRank plunge has been painfully obvious to people like Andy Beard and Darren Rowse. It puts an image of an old joke about morale in our minds: “the beatings will continue until morale improves.”
As for PageRank improving, there aren’t any instructions about that. But paid links won’t be in the equation, it seems.
Oct 212007
Reciprocal Links Exchange Are (Still) Not Dead
found at isedb
Reciprocal links are not dead. Weren’t dead before. Aren’t dead now. I know it and you know it. But for just a second let’s pretend otherwise.
reciprocallinksarenotdead A while back there was quite a bit of scare mongering going around the SEO industry about how reciprocal links were dead. I had a potential client once tell me that so-and-so-big-name-in-the-SEO-industry told them that reciprocal links were dead. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it here again. There is nothing wrong with reciprocal links. It’s all about how you use/implement them that matters. No, reciprocal links are not dead and now I have the proof.
Last year I decided to run my own test so I could refute what I already knew to be true. Yeah, I know who cares about reciprocal links now, right? The fear tactics have run their course and, frankly, nobody is engaged in old-school mass reciprocal link swapping (for the love of God people, if you’re still doing that, knock it off!) But for the sake of science and posterity, I now, over a year later, present the results of my (almost forgotten) reciprocal link test.
The Set-Up
On one of my sites I created a master testing page. From this page I linked to eight new pages created specifically for this test. Each of those pages contained a few paragraphs of content with the word “reciprocallinksarenotdead” linked to an external web site. The goal was to watch the search results to see what sites appeared in the SERPs for our test term.
For the sake of creating a good testing ground, we linked to four sites that linked back and four sites that didn’t. From here we split things up even further by linking to two sites in each group to that we considered to be “high authority” for their industry, and two that we considered to be “lower authority” for their industry. We then split this again using one to link using the target site’s keyword in the link and the other not. Got all that? No? OK, let me put it to you this way (the links below take you to the test pages):
Links to reciprocal linking sites
- Link to a low authority site using keyword
- Link to a low authority site
- Link to a high authority site using keyword
- Link to a high authority site
Link to non-reciprocal linking sites
- Link to a low authority site using keyword
- Link to a low authority site
- Link to a high authority site using keyword
- Link to a high authority site
The Sting
I started out checking up on this daily seeing if Google, Yahoo or MSN cached the pages linking out and then watching if/when they showed up in the SERPs. The result was quite a roller coaster ride. One day the test pages would be cached and the next day the cache date was from several days prior. This happened frequently. The same thing with the SERPs. One day
all the test pages would show up and the next day gone and then the next day just some of the test pages showed up and the next others, but not necessarily the ones from the previous day. It was interesting to watch.After about several weeks of daily monitoring I started to cut back to every few days, then weekly then, well I kind of forgot about it with the occasional thought “Hey, I wonder how that test is going”, in which I’d take a quick look and forget all about it again. Here we are now, over a year later and I think I can confidently display the results as definitive.
The Results
Note: These were the results as of Friday, July 12, 2007, I notice that there has been some shifting in results since then, so your mileage may vary.
- Low authority, non reciprocating site
- Low authority, non reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- High authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Test page linking to #9 below
- Test page linking to #2 above
- Low authority, reciprocating site
- High authority, reciprocating site
- High authority, non-reciprocating site (keyword in link)
Google supplemental results show the remainder of the testing pages. Missing from SERPs: High authority, non-reciprocating site
- Low authority, reciprocating site
- High authority, non-reciprocating site
- High authority, reciprocating site
- Test page linking to #8 below
- Test page linking to #2 above
- Low authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, non-reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- High authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Link to a blog post that uses keyword as part of the URL
Missing from SERPs:
- Low authority, reciprocating site
- High authority, non-reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- High authority, reciprocating site
- Test page linking to #10 below
- Test page linking to #1 above
- Low authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, non reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- Low authority, non reciprocating site
- High authority, reciprocating site (keyword in link)
- High authority, non-reciprocating site
- High authority, non-reciprocating site
- Low authority, reciprocating site
The Happy Ending
We can conclude from that that, all things being equal, reciprocating links have no more or less value than one-way links. Yeah, I know, we all read Matt Cutt’s post about how excessive reciprocal linking can hurt, and I’m sure Matt is right. But the key word there is “excessive”. If all you do is look for low-quality reciprocal links that ad no value to any user’s experience then, yes, that can, and should do you some harm. But don’t be afraid of reciprocation. If someone links to you out of kindness, feel free to link back to them out of gratitude. It’s not going to hurt you one bit and the link to you won’t be devalued. Just be sure you’re adding value, not reciprocating for the sake of reciprocating.
So what do you think? Is this test conclusive or an exercise in futility?
Stoney deGeyter leads a spectacular team of seasoned marketing experts at Pole Position Marketing, a search engine marketing company. Stoney started PPM in 1998 by finding the brightest minds in the industry and nurturing within them an intense desire to become leaders in their respective fields. With this team of professionals, he has built a wildly successful website marketing company that succeeds through both personal and professional integrity.
You can read Stoney’s blog posts at the E-Marketing Performance blog and more of his work on several well-known SEO and marketing news sources including Search Engine Guide and Web Pro News. Stoney has authored two website marketing books: E-Marketing Performance: Effective strategies for building, optimizing, and marketing your website online and Keyword Research and Selection: The definitive guide to gathering, sorting and organizing your keywords into a high-performance SEO campaign.
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by Gabriel Goldenberg)
I’ve seen them work myself, and agree with the test. What’s interesting is that each engine put a low authority site on top. And per the first 5, Yahoo’s results were best (high authority and test page). But there’s another point for reciprocals: networking. My blogroll is a source of great links in the future too 
. Last point: I still get [spam] emails, from one site in particular, asking for reciprocals. Irrelevant niche, and just doing it for SEO. They’re so dumb, I actually pity them. (I don’t normally insult people in public fora, but they spammed me, so I’ll relax my rules momentarily…)